Roster ratings · 2026-27 · Colorado Avalanche

Who has actually been good

TeamColorado Avalanche
Season2026-27

Every Colorado Avalanche player rated out of 100 against NHL players at his own position. Wins above replacement sits beside each rating, and the bars show where the number comes from — sort by any situation to see who is driving the power play or holding up defensively.

90+Elite75+Top of the roster60+Middle of the roster40+Everyday NHLer20+Depth0+Below replacement
Focus
Roster total2.7wins above replacement across 24 players
#PlayerRatingGPTOIWAR splitWAR
1Mackenzie BlackwoodG667411Situation split+0.42
2Cale MakarD9310225Situation split+0.28
3Martin NecasC9111221Situation split+0.25
4Devon ToewsD8611224Situation split+0.22
5Nathan MacKinnonC8611233Situation split+0.21
6Brock NelsonC8311201Situation split+0.19
7Gabriel LandeskogL6911168Situation split+0.13
8Nazem KadriC6811217Situation split+0.13
9Parker KellyC6811142Situation split+0.13
10T.J. HughesR6511165Situation split+0.12
11Jaden SchwartzL6511156Situation split+0.12
12Artturi LehkonenL6411208Situation split+0.12
13Sam MalinskiD5710172Situation split+0.09
14Brent BurnsD5511177Situation split+0.08
15Fedor SvechkovC4411146Situation split+0.08
16Josh MansonD4811176Situation split+0.06
17Scott WedgewoodG344241Situation split+0.03
18Brett KulakD3011207Situation split+0.02
19Noah JuulsenD24774Situation split+0.01
20Nicolas RoyC—558Situation split+0.01
21Gavin BrindleyC—433Situation split+0.01
22Logan O'ConnorR—227Situation split+0.00
23Taylor MakarL—213Situation split-0.00
24Zachary L'HeureuxL—327Situation split-0.00
Situation split
Even-strength offenseEven-strength defensePower-play offensePower-play defenseShorthanded offenseShorthanded defensePenalties (drawn minus taken)Finishing (goals above expected)

A rating is a player's percentile among NHL players at his position — defensemen are ranked against defensemen, not against forwards, so a 70 means different things for a winger and a blueliner in raw wins. It is measured from wins above replacement, which converts on-ice and individual contributions into wins beyond what a freely available replacement would provide. Bars are drawn on a shared scale, so they are comparable down the column. How this is calculated